ISSN 2413-2322 (Online)

ISSN 2221-1055 (Print)

UDS: 631.16:330.131.7:347.426.6(476)
Зарубіжний досвід розвитку аграрного виробництва

African swine fever risk assessment and compensation calculation methodology: Lithuanian case / Gapšys Albertas, Dabkienė Vida // Ekonomika APK. - 2014. - № 10 - P. 85

The aim of the article is to represent the government’s compensation calculation method for pig breeders in buffer zones, which should compensate for not breeding pigs temporarily and compel farmers to report about ASF cases. As well, to analyze the pig-–breeding situation and the main factors, which show that Lithuania is at high risk zone for ASF disease dissemination. The main risk estimators of ASF introduction into the Lithuania are density of outbreaks of ASF virus in a wild boar and in domestic pigs and low-biosecurity farms within the country and in neighboring countries, density of wild boar and pigs within the country. The calculation of the compensation for pig breeders in the buffer zone is represented. The estimated coefficients of pig production cycle and pig breeder’s income and remuneration in the pig breeder’s future income should compensate for not breeding pigs temporarily and compel pig breeders to report about ASF outbreaks. Tabl.: 2. Figs.: 1. Refs.: 26.
Key words: African Swine Fever, pig breeding, wild boars, risk estimators, compensation, buffer zone

References

  1. Beltran-Alcudo D. 2008.African swine fever in the Caucasus. Empress Watch. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload/242232/ew_caucasus_apr08.pdf
  2. Bendikas P. et al. 1998. Gyvulininkystės pagrindai. Mokymo priemonė aukštesniųjų žemės ūkio mokyklų studentams ir žemės ūkio mokyklų moksleiviams. LŽŪM: Mokymo metodikos centras: Vilnius.
  3. Costard S. et al. 2009. African swine fever: how can global spread be prevented? Philosophical transactions of Royal society, vol. 364, p. 2683–2696. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2865084/
  4. De la Torre A. et al. 2013. Assessing the Risk of African Swine Fever introduction into the European Union by Wild Boar. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.ars.usda.gov/GARA/publications/De%20la%20Torre%20et%20al%202013%20ASF.pdf
  5. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2011. African Swine Fever in Russia, 11th April 2011. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/monitoring/documents/asf-russia-110411.pdf
  6. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2012. African Swine Fever in Ukraine. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.defra.gov.uk/animal-diseases/files/poa-asf-ukraine-20120802.pdf
  7. DEFRA (Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs). 2013. African Swine Fever in Belarus and Russia. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.defra.gov.uk/animal-diseases/files/poa-asf-russia-20130624.pdf
  8. Deinet S. et al. 2013. Wildlife comeback in Europe: The recovery of selected mammal and bird species. Final report to Rewilding Europe by ZSL, Bird Life International and the European Bird Census Council. London, UK: ZSL. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: https://static.zsl.org/files/wildlife-comeback-in-europe-the-recovery-of-selected-mammal-and-bird-species-2576.pdf
  9. Department of Statistics in Lithuania. 2013. Agriculture in Lithuania. Vilnius.
  10. Dudnikov et al. 2011. A forecast for African Swine Fever in the Russian Federation in 2012. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.fsvps.ru/fsvps-docs/ru/iac/publications/iac_public24.pdf
  11. EC. 2013. Animal health and welfare. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal /diseases/adns/index_en.htm.
  12. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority). 2014. Scientific Opinion on African swine fever. EFSA Journal, vol. 12 (4). [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/1556.htm
  13. Enticott G., Lee R. 2008. Buying bio security – compensation for animal diseases. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://regulation.upf.edu/dublin-10-papers/1F3.pdf
  14. European Parliament. 2013. Control of swine fever in the EU. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/bibliotheque/briefing/2013/130461/LDM_BRI(2013)130461_REV1_EN.pdf
  15. EVIRA (Finnish Food Safety Aurhority). 2011. Research Reports. Possible routes of entry into the country for African swine fever – Risk profile.
  16. Jančienė I, Kvietkutė N., Mikelėnas A. 2002. Kiaulininkystės laboratorinių ir praktinių darbų metodiniai nurodymai. Kaunas.
  17. Jančienė, I. 2005. Kiaulininkystė. Terra Publica: Kaunas.
  18. Khomenko S. et al. 2013. African swine fever in the Russian Federation: risk factors for Europe and Beyond. Empress watch, vol. 28. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/aq240e/aq240e.pdf
  19. Kuchler F., Hamm S. 2000. Animal disease incidence and indemnity eradication programs. Agricultural Economics, vol. 22, p. 299–308.
  20. Kukenys D. 1979. Kiaulininkystė. Mokslas:Vilnius.
  21. OIE. 2013. Event summary. African swine fever, Russia. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Reviewreport/Review/viewsummary?fupser=&dothis=&reportid=14684
  22. Skrzymovska K. 2012. Pig production in Poland. Presentation in EPP congress, 30th of May, Vilnius. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.pigproducer.net/uploads/media/5_Katarzyna-Skrzymowska.pdf
  23. Valeeva N., Backus G. 2007. Incentive Systems under ex post Moral Hazard to Control Outbreaks of Classical Swine Fever in the Netherlands. Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Portland, OR, July 29-August 1. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/9934/1/sp07va01.pdf.
  24. Viltrop A., Jeremejeva J. 2011. Risk Profile of African Swine Fever for Estonia. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.agri.ee/public/juurkataloog/TRUKISED/2011/riskiprofiil_sigadeaafrikakatk_2011.pdf
  25. Whiting T. L. 2003. Foreign animal disease outbreaks, the animal welfare implications for Canada: Risks apparent from international experience. Canadian Veterinary journal, vol. 44, p. 805–815.
  26. Wolf C. A. 2013. Livestock disease indemnity design: considering asymmetric information. Livestock disease policies: building bridges between science and economies. [Electronic resource]. – Access mode: http://www.oecd.org/tad/agricultural-policies/Livestock%20disease%20indemnity%20design.pdf.
Read article: 14_10_85-91.pdf