ISSN 2413-2322 (Online)

ISSN 2221-1055 (Print)

UDS: 331.477.05 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202111044
Аграрний менеджмент і підприємництво

Social capital in the development of social entrepreneurship / Shelenko D.I., Balaniuk I.F., Balaniuk V.S. // Ekonomika APK. - 2021. - № 11 - P. 44

The purpose of the article is to theoretically substantiate and analyze the ways in which social capital influences the devel-opment of social entrepreneurship. The task of this study is aimed at increasing attention to the impact of social capital on the development of social entrepreneurship and outlining opportunities for effective activities of economic entities. Research methods. The methodological basis of the research is a complex research method - to characterize socially active enterprises operating in Ivano-Frankivsk region, as well as to get acquainted with the world experience of social entrepreneurship. A prerequisite for the formation of social capital of the potential inherent in it is a consistent and systematic solution to the problem, which will include a set of defining principles. The following general and special methods were used in the research process: analysis and synthesis to evaluate the activity of socially active entrepreneurship; analytical groupings - to establish differences between business and social entrepreneurship; abstract-logical during the formation of theoretical generalizations. Research results. The role and place of social capital in the development of social entrepreneurship have been considered. Consistent contexts of studying the theory of social capital are highlighted. The socially active enterprises of Ivano-Frankivsk region are analyzed and the description of achievements of their activity is given. The main directions of social enterprise development in the countryside have been given. The world experience of social entrepreneurship is studied. The differences between business entrepreneurship and social entrepreneurship are identified. Scientific novelty. The substantiation of the development of social capital in the development of entrepreneurship has been deepened. The interpretation of social capital gave grounds to consider it as a system that covers the necessary for each episode of the set of subsystems at different levels, which is designed to have a real impact on the development of economic entities. Practical significance. Proposals for scientific understanding of the essence of the potential of socially active enterprises have been developed, which will serve as a basis for deepening theoretical and methodological research on the problems of social capital development in entrepreneurship. The presented provisions are aimed at revealing the typical features and the most significant problematic issues of the characteristics of socially active enterprises of Ivano-Frankivsk region, which need attention from public authorities and local governments. Tabl.: 1. Refs.: 24.
Key words: social capital; social entrepreneurship; business entrepreneurship; social relations; cooperation; socially active enterprises

References

  1. Alieksieieva, O.V. (2021). Rozvytok ahrarnoho pidpryiemnytstva u formuvanni instytutsiinoho mekhanizmu zainiatosti naselennia [Development of agrarian entrepreneurship in the formation of the institutional mechanism of employment]. PhD thesis. Kyiv [In Ukrainian].
  2. Balanda, A.L. & Nadraga, V.I. (2013). Sotsialnyi kapital pidpryiemstva: perevahy ta ryzyky proiavu [Social capital of the enterprise: advantages and risks of manifestation]. Visnyk Berdianskoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu, 1 (21), pp. 37-41 [In Ukrainian].
  3. V Obertyni seliany ob’iednalys u kooperatyv i zarobliaiut na sukhofruktakh. Yak yim tse vdalos? [In Obertin, peasants have joined a cooperative and earn their living from dried fruit. How did they do it?]. Retrieved from: https://shotam.info/v-obertyni-seliany-ob-iednalys-u-kooperatyv-i-zarobliaiut-na-sukhofruktakh-yak-im-tse-vdalos/ [In Ukrainian].
  4. Galanec', V.G. (1979). Jeffektivnost' upravlenija: teorija, metodika, praktika [Management efficiency: theory, methodology, practice]: L'vov : Vyshcha shk. [In Russian].
  5. Demianchuk, O.I. (2011). Formuvannia vlastyvostei sotsialnoho kapitalu pidpryiemstva [Formation of properties of social capital of the enterprise]. Naukovi zapysky Natsionalnoho universytetu «Ostrozka akademiia». Seriia: Ekonomika, 16, pp. 270-276 [In Ukrainian].
  6. Diuk, A.A. (2021). Rozvytok ta orhanizatsiino-ekonomichna sotsializatsiia pidpryiemnytstva na seli: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka [Development and organizational and economic socialization of rural entrepreneurship: theory, methodology, practice]. Doctor`s thesis. Vinnytsia [In Ukrainian].
  7. Eliseeva, L.V. (2017). Ekonomichnyi zmist ta vydy sotsialnoho kapitalu [Economic content and types of social capital]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia ekonomichni nauky, 22 (1), pp. 8-11 [In Ukrainian].
  8. Zelena knyha sotsialnoho pidpryiemnytstva v Ukraini [Green Paper on Social Entrepreneurship in Ukraine]. (2019). Kyiv : Ukrainskyi Forum Blahodiinykiv [In Ukrainian].
  9. Lupenko, Yu.O., Malik, M.Yo., Zaiats, V.M., Shpykuliak, O.H., et al. (2016). Rozvytok pidpryiemnytstva i kooperatsii: instytutsionalnyi aspect [Development of entrepreneurship and cooperation: institutional aspect]. Kyiv: NNTs «IAE» [In Ukrainian].
  10. Smit, A. (1962). Issledovanie o prirode i prichinah bogatstva narodov [Research on the nature and causes of the wealth of nations]. Moskva : Socjekgiz [In Russian].
  11. Social entrepreneurship in Ukraine. Economic and legal analysis [Sotsialne pidpryiemnytstvo v Ukraini. Ekonomiko-pravovyi analiz]. (2020). Eu4youth – rozkryttia potentsialu molodykh sotsialnykh pidpryiemtsiv v Moldovi ta Ukraini [In Ukrainian].
  12. Ukrainska kooperatsiia pid Polshcheiu v rotsi 1928 [Ukrainian cooperation near Poland in 1928]. (1928). Statystyka soiuznykh kooperatyviv. Lviv : Reviziinyi soiuz Ukrainskykh kooperatyviv [In Ukrainian].
  13. Shpykuliak, O.H. (2007). Stanovlennia sotsialnoho kapitalu v ahrarnii sferi transformatsiinoi ekonomiky [Formation of social capital in the agricultural sphere of transformational economy]. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 8, pp. 28-34. Retrieved from: http://mts.asu.lt/mtsrbid/article/view/678/704 [In Ukrainian].
  14. Shpykuliak, O.H. & Malik, M.Yo. (2019). Instytutsionalnyi analiz rozvytku pidpryiemnytstva v ahrarnomu sektori ekonomiky: metodychnyi aspekt [Institutional analysis of entrepreneuship development in the agrarian sector of economy: methodical aspect]. Ekonomika APK, 6, pp. 73-82 [In Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.201906073
  15. Austin J., Stevenson H. (2006). Wei-Skillern. Social and commercial entrepreneurship: The same, different or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 30(1), pp. 1-22. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/ j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x [In English].
  16. Balaniuk, I., Kozak, I., Balaniuk, S., Kozak-Balaniuk, I., Sas, L., Shelenko, D. (2021). The role of united territorial communities in the functioning of agricultural enterprises. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, 43, 1, pp. 52-66. Retrieved from: https://ejournals.vdu.lt/index.php/mtsrbid/article/view/2148/1609 [In English].
  17. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The Forms of Capital, w: Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, J. Ri-chardson (ed.), New York. [In English].
  18. Dees, J.G. (2001). The meaning of social entrepreneurship. Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University's Fuqua School of Business, Retrieved from: uke.edu/case/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2015/03/Article_Dees_MeaningofSocialEntrepreneurship_2001.pdf [In English].
  19. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Kapitał społeczny, w: Kultura ma znaczenie, L. E. Harrison, S. P. Huntington (Eds.), Zysk i S-ka, Krakуw [In Polish].
  20. Hanifan, L.J. (1916). The Rural School Community Center, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 67. Retrieved from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000271621606700118 [In English].
  21. Putnam, R.D. (1995). Demokracja w działaniu. Tradycje obywatelskie we współczesnych Włoszech, Wydawnictwo Znak, Warszawa−Krakуw [In Poland].
  22. Putnam, R.D. (2001). Social Capital: Measurement and Consequences. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/6/1825848.pdf [In English].
  23. Rozwój przedsiębiorczości społecznej w Polsce i wybranych krajach Unii Europejskiej. Raport przygotowany zlecenie Polskiej Agencji Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości przez Instytut Analiz Rynku Pracy. (2020). Retrieved from: https://www.parp.gov.pl/component/publications/publication/rozwoj-przedsiebiorczosci-spolecznej-w-polsce-i-wybranych-krajach-unii-europejskiej [In Polish].
  24. Zadek S. & Thake S. (1997). Send in the social entrepreneurs. New Statesman, 26, 31 [In English].
Read article: ekonomika_apk_11_2021_p_44-53.pdf